And again markfedin, the paid posted got this to the FP in record time. 88 diggs in 34 minutes. Did any one here who posted a comment digg this? Did any one who "Dugg" it post a comment?
Uh, what the f**k? This article is awful and yet somehow is rapidly receiving a huge number of diggs, when this site is essentially dead right now and the submitter has 16 followers? Something extremely fishy is going on here.
I also reported and sent feedback to digg. Every story he has posted has gotten 100's of diggs in one or two hours with less than 10 and mostly 0 comments.
you can click the x to 'hide' a story, but it doesn't vote the story off Digg. The problem with this is that crap articles and auto-submitted stuff inevitably makes the front page which otherwise never would have.
Digg was created as a social news site, projecting the most liked articles and links onto the front page. If we're not doing that anymore, we might as well stop calling it a social news site, since the front page doesn't reflect user's preferences, just "highly clickable" sites with farmed content and ad partners.
That's some very poor syntax, and your use of capitals is frowned upon. Also, to 'f**k' implies an active penetration, and an 'ass****', being recessed and basically a hole of dubious functional purpose, would be precluded from doing so. Had you thought your comment through properly?
rvignesh9008Sep 9, 2010Buried
What is digg going to do to stop spam?
dirtyfriesSep 10, 2010Buried
Making it so crappy that people won't visit. Spammers won't bother trying anymore.
jollygood667Sep 9, 2010Buried
Digg needs to close the door for spammers. End v4!
hurrayforschoolSep 9, 2010Buried
Digg closes door for success
kaiserarnySep 9, 2010Buried
Door closes for Digg
unfriendlyfireSep 9, 2010Buried
And again markfedin, the paid posted got this to the FP in record time. 88 diggs in 34 minutes. Did any one here who posted a comment digg this? Did any one who "Dugg" it post a comment?
stolemybikeSep 9, 2010Buried
Uh, what the f**k? This article is awful and yet somehow is rapidly receiving a huge number of diggs, when this site is essentially dead right now and the submitter has 16 followers? Something extremely fishy is going on here.
Reported.
cyberdroppingSep 9, 2010Buried
Digg needs to sell some oxen and get the bury button back....
unfriendlyfireSep 9, 2010Buried
I also reported and sent feedback to digg. Every story he has posted has gotten 100's of diggs in one or two hours with less than 10 and mostly 0 comments.
celino_cSep 9, 2010Buried
Great timing. Digg's doors are open for them now
nickedynickSep 9, 2010Buried
They're letting you continue commenting on articles, apparently.
rvignesh9008Sep 9, 2010Buried
Damn, I think he is a hacker.. That's not at all possible to my knowledge.. the total number of diggs he has is abt 16.. That stinks :(
diggenerateSep 10, 2010Buried
It is practically the entire point of DIGG, people can either DIGG something or bury it. now they can't and the only stories getting through are SPAM
drleephdSep 10, 2010Buried
you can click the x to 'hide' a story, but it doesn't vote the story off Digg. The problem with this is that crap articles and auto-submitted stuff inevitably makes the front page which otherwise never would have.
Digg was created as a social news site, projecting the most liked articles and links onto the front page. If we're not doing that anymore, we might as well stop calling it a social news site, since the front page doesn't reflect user's preferences, just "highly clickable" sites with farmed content and ad partners.
hastynamechoiceSep 10, 2010Buried
That's some very poor syntax, and your use of capitals is frowned upon. Also, to 'f**k' implies an active penetration, and an 'ass****', being recessed and basically a hole of dubious functional purpose, would be precluded from doing so. Had you thought your comment through properly?
kirzenSep 10, 2010Buried
Its super effective!
yanko1975Sep 10, 2010Buried
I am tired of the front page being full of RSS Feed Auto Submits and Spammers. The front page is boring, and I can't take it any more.
I don't have a political motivation, or ulterior motive, other than removing the spam.
Contact me at enfor2001@gmail.com
RaoPhoenixSep 9, 2010Buried
I can't even see upcoming here.
unfriendlyfireSep 9, 2010Buried
Now 101 in 37 minutes