453

'Oldest living thing on earth' discovered - Telegraph

telegraph.co.uk — Ancient patches of a giant seagrass in the Mediterranean Sea are now considered the oldest living organism on Earth... Feb 7, 2012

  • via bettverboten
  • Bury
+ Add

66 Comments

bendvisFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+14Vote!

That's really something to wrap your brain around. Those same plants that are alive today were chilling in the water when:

1) the Bubonic Plague ravaged the known world (~1500 AD),
2) the Babylonian Empire held all of the Middle East (~500 BC)
3) The Pyramids were under construction (~2500 BC)
4) People were first learning to use irrigation to grow crops(~5000 BC)
5) Grain farming started (~10,000 BC)
6) Humans first started migrating into North America (~15,000 BC)
7) Homo Erectus went extinct (~30,000 BC)
8) Humans Left Africa (~50,000 BC)

If those plants are 200,000 years old, then they are quite possibly as old as the human race.

bendvisFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+14Vote!

Anatomically modern humans (Homo Sapiens) have existed for ~200,000 years.

You're right though, predecessor humanoid species have existed for ~6 million years, but they were strictly plant-eaters.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/human-characteristics/bodies

gbudavidFeb 7, 2012Buried

Show+13Vote!

I guess that makes it OLD:)

PatriceBeaulieu12Feb 7, 2012Buried

Show+13Vote!

It amazes me how scientists can figure this stuff out.

angrycat70Feb 8, 2012Buried

Show+13Vote!

That's when the Battlestar Galactica and fleet limped into orbit and the Colonials and the hybrid Hera were added to the gene pool.

PreferredMNFeb 7, 2012Buried

Show+12Vote!

This is really incredible.

bcarl314Feb 8, 2012Buried

Show+11Vote!

I think you're confusing religion with science.

caseycooldFeb 7, 2012Buried

Show+11Vote!

"12,000 and 200,000 years old"
That's a f**king SWAG

kvnkaneFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+9Vote!

my blackberry feels older

MrFrogyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+8Vote!

“Betty White is so old that on her first game show, the prize was fire!” Lisa Lampanelli

soonerdude711Feb 8, 2012Buried

Show+7Vote!

lulz, confused girl is confused.

moxleyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+6Vote!

It's not Joan Rivers?

whacklyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+5Vote!

uh... derp

mikec1998Feb 8, 2012Buried

Show+5Vote!

This statement is so stupid it makes my head hurt, how does dating the age of a plant have anything to do with the accounting practices of the federal government?

phpistastyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+4Vote!

To analyze a species you collect DNA samples , sequence them, and compare differences. The more a species procreates, the more changes in the DNA. Fewer changes means a new species, or a species that hasn't undergone much change. The article uses humans as its example to try and illustrate the point. The plant reproduces asexually (less genetic exchange) and clones itself (continuation of the current DNA).

Unless I read a different article....

paechanFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+4Vote!

How can you not relate that statement to the distribution of the data?

whacklyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+4Vote!

because acknowledging that the information is meant to demonstrate the awesomely wide range of ages found in the collected samples doesn't allow him to sneer disdainfully.

whacklyFeb 8, 2012Buried

Show+4Vote!

this guy seems legit...

anomaly100Feb 7, 2012Buried

Show+3Vote!

I thought....I thought I was the oldest living thing on Earth:-(

Load More
Add Comment
XClose