The President appoints SCOTUS judges that can overturn Roe v Wade, obviously. Not a freedom hater here - just a theocracy hater and sexism-hater, racism-hater and heterosexism-hater. Stop the spin and try having a real conversation.
Correction; Ron Paul has no problem keeping the federal government out of the equation when states impose laws (or don't impose laws).
He also has no problem with the people of Nevada fighting to change laws or create laws as they see fit. Ron Paul understands that the people of Nevada can much more easily fight to change the state of Nevada, than they can fight to change Washington, when laws (or lack of laws) don't suit their needs.
If the federal government stuck to it's constitutional bounds, you would probably see Ron Paul in his home state of Texas fighting his state government to decentralize power there and distribute it as locally as possible; because Ron Paul knows that it will be easier for people effected by a bad state-level law, to get together fight their local government than it is to fight their state government, when they pass bad laws, or don't pass laws they should.
See the difference? Now stop misrepresenting and admit you are a closet supporter. . . because you want to live in a peaceful world, under laws you (and like-minded individuals) agree with, and only Ron Paul (out of all the presidential candidates) understands and will push for this ideal.
Ron Paul also co-sponsored a bill to define life as starting at conception federally, which would ban abortion and many contraceptives as well. Stupid bitches.
And just who is going to overturn Roe vs Wade? Why anyone could think the president can make laws is beyond me. Seriously, you think these women are having unprotected sex? not using contraceptives to the max?
Not to mention, a country having it's own rights to make law? God forbid that.
RP has no problem allowing states to decide what is right for their citizens. Under a Ron Paul administration, the only "imposing" would happen at the state level rather than the federal level; which should result in greater legislative relevance for us all.
Easy to make sense ... Ron Paul and Rick Santorum don't agree on much. Rick Santurum is just like Bush but with a little more homophobia. Ron Paul is more like Thomas Jefferson with less baggage. :)
upnorthgirlJan 5, 2012Buried
Well, I sure those christian conservatives will love this one.
jonz334Jan 5, 2012Buried
Think he ever made a visit?
johnnr2Jan 5, 2012Buried
Ron Paul has no problem allowing Nevada to impose laws making birth control and or abortion illegal at the state level. These women are fools.
johnnr2Jan 5, 2012Buried
The President appoints SCOTUS judges that can overturn Roe v Wade, obviously. Not a freedom hater here - just a theocracy hater and sexism-hater, racism-hater and heterosexism-hater. Stop the spin and try having a real conversation.
kwanijmlJan 5, 2012Buried
Correction; Ron Paul has no problem keeping the federal government out of the equation when states impose laws (or don't impose laws).
He also has no problem with the people of Nevada fighting to change laws or create laws as they see fit. Ron Paul understands that the people of Nevada can much more easily fight to change the state of Nevada, than they can fight to change Washington, when laws (or lack of laws) don't suit their needs.
If the federal government stuck to it's constitutional bounds, you would probably see Ron Paul in his home state of Texas fighting his state government to decentralize power there and distribute it as locally as possible; because Ron Paul knows that it will be easier for people effected by a bad state-level law, to get together fight their local government than it is to fight their state government, when they pass bad laws, or don't pass laws they should.
See the difference? Now stop misrepresenting and admit you are a closet supporter. . . because you want to live in a peaceful world, under laws you (and like-minded individuals) agree with, and only Ron Paul (out of all the presidential candidates) understands and will push for this ideal.
chilidogsJan 6, 2012Buried
"even whores"
Wow. You are one classy guy. I can't imagine why everyone isn't on your side.
diggduggjoeJan 6, 2012Buried
Most of what Ron Paul suggests is far from the crack pot realm. He probably has a better sense of reality than most candidates for office.
ciarJan 5, 2012Buried
Ron Paul also co-sponsored a bill to define life as starting at conception federally, which would ban abortion and many contraceptives as well. Stupid bitches.
wlpowellJan 6, 2012Buried
Ron Paul's voting record on environment issues alone make Jefferson spin in his grave
FrankLuskaJan 5, 2012Buried
And just who is going to overturn Roe vs Wade? Why anyone could think the president can make laws is beyond me. Seriously, you think these women are having unprotected sex? not using contraceptives to the max?
Not to mention, a country having it's own rights to make law? God forbid that.
Your not a Freedom Hater, Are you?
waldo686Jan 6, 2012Buried
thanks kwanijml for explaining that to everyone else
FrankLuskaJan 5, 2012Buried
Good on em, not like the "state of sin" is going to ban abortion.
chadpyleJan 6, 2012Buried
RP has no problem allowing states to decide what is right for their citizens. Under a Ron Paul administration, the only "imposing" would happen at the state level rather than the federal level; which should result in greater legislative relevance for us all.
mountaindwellerJan 6, 2012Buried
Bravo...well said
chadpyleJan 6, 2012Buried
Ron Paul is a Christian conservative. He just happens to be against imposing his will and beliefs on others.
FrankLuskaJan 6, 2012Buried
Some chilidogs are pretty strong depending on spices and condiments.
bluto36Jan 6, 2012Buried
is their a more proper name for whore that works at a whore house that will not offend you so much?
i would like to use that from now on.
Ouzel7Jan 5, 2012Buried
Always make sure to wear a condom when you are endorsing.
richpaulfreemanJan 6, 2012Buried
Easy to make sense ... Ron Paul and Rick Santorum don't agree on much. Rick Santurum is just like Bush but with a little more homophobia. Ron Paul is more like Thomas Jefferson with less baggage. :)
richpaulfreemanJan 16, 2012Buried
I don't know what Jefferson's view of environmental issues would have been, but he would not have handled it at the Federal level. It's a state issue.