Porn isn't the only thing that isn't science and the useful arts. Everything Hollywood and the recording industry produce is just frivolous entertainment, which should get no copyright protection. Entertainment is worth what an audience decides it is worth, no more. If that is nothing at all, tough! Entertainers can always get a real job.
I doubt they really believe that it can't be copyrighted, and doubt they could win on those grounds, but threatening to push the issue in court might be an interesting way to get the plaintiff to back away from a risk.
It's also interesting that the constitution only protects writings and inventions, I did not know that. It's obviously already a stretch to extend protection to sound and image recordings.
It's the irony that the most fascinating aspect of this I think. Outfits like Hard Drive and their lawyer bottom feeders essentially coerce their victims into paying them a lesser amount rather than risk a far larger amount by going to court. But in this case they are the ones taking a huge risk by going to court. If they lose and porn is determined to be not copyrightable then their whole little extortion scheme is kaput....and they all might have to actually start looking for honest work somewhere.
just like they take you to court for stupid things, i thing her response is appropriate. if she wins hollywood should start trembling cause the last time they produced something useful was .... never
uncoverorFeb 7, 2012Buried
Porn isn't the only thing that isn't science and the useful arts. Everything Hollywood and the recording industry produce is just frivolous entertainment, which should get no copyright protection. Entertainment is worth what an audience decides it is worth, no more. If that is nothing at all, tough! Entertainers can always get a real job.
langfordFeb 6, 2012Buried
I doubt they really believe that it can't be copyrighted, and doubt they could win on those grounds, but threatening to push the issue in court might be an interesting way to get the plaintiff to back away from a risk.
andysasylumFeb 6, 2012Buried
Damn.. i thought I had the rights to all that bondage porn i produced in the mid 80's!!
casspaFeb 6, 2012Buried
It'd be phenomenal if this made it to the Supreme Court, but sadly it never will.
ninhFeb 6, 2012Buried
It's also interesting that the constitution only protects writings and inventions, I did not know that. It's obviously already a stretch to extend protection to sound and image recordings.
audreyseeFeb 6, 2012Buried
Then what can you copyright?
jeworldFeb 7, 2012Buried
Never thought of it like this. Very well said.
cantstopwontstopFeb 7, 2012Buried
*knock knock*
"Hey there litigation lawyer is that a big case in your pants or are you just happy to see me?"
Dillin523Feb 7, 2012Buried
Yes you can, dummy.
brucealmightyFeb 7, 2012Buried
It's the irony that the most fascinating aspect of this I think. Outfits like Hard Drive and their lawyer bottom feeders essentially coerce their victims into paying them a lesser amount rather than risk a far larger amount by going to court. But in this case they are the ones taking a huge risk by going to court. If they lose and porn is determined to be not copyrightable then their whole little extortion scheme is kaput....and they all might have to actually start looking for honest work somewhere.
zeedeoFeb 8, 2012Buried
just like they take you to court for stupid things, i thing her response is appropriate. if she wins hollywood should start trembling cause the last time they produced something useful was .... never