And yet you don't find it odd that the Senate historically has been in RECESS until at least January 3rd? Nope, nothing odd about breaking tradition for no reason.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Show 1 ReplyYou mean except when Reid didn't recess the Senate, historically speaking, in 2006 and 2007?
Show 1 Replythe question at hand is what counts as not being in recess. The courts probably should define that so that there is no more confusion
Show 2 RepliesI don't think the courts will... It borders too closely on the separation of powers and is something that should be determined by the legislature or the executive office.
Doesn't mean they won't get involved if forced but I don't think it's going to come to that because neither party wants to get the courts involved.
But be assured, Obama's opened a dangerous can of worms.
clickfire6 days ago
Thruzt, but verify.